Your school should now have its share of the DfE's new £400m-a-year fund, and by 31 December 2026 you need to publish an inclusion strategy showing how you'll use it. Below: the fund in plain terms with links to the DfE sources, then a worked strategy entry for each of the seven principles that you can adapt. Further down, we make the case for Robyn, our AI teaching assistant, as one of the things you could spend it on.
Free trial first. No hardware. Robyn is used in primary and secondary classrooms across England.
We sell a classroom tool and we'll pitch it further down. First, the DfE's published guidance in brief, with links underneath so you can check any of it against the original.
A new, ring-fenced grant from the Department for Education to help mainstream schools move "towards practices that are inclusive by design, providing early support directly to children without the need for diagnosis or statutory process". It was announced in the schools white paper Every child achieving and thriving. £400m a year goes to schools, with separate pots for 16-19 providers and early years.
Every mainstream primary, secondary, middle and all-through school in England, for the 5 to 16 age range including reception: maintained schools, academies, free schools and city technology colleges. There are no pupil-level criteria and nothing to apply for.
It's formula-based: a £3,000 lump sum per school, plus £16 per primary pupil or £14 per secondary pupil, plus £79 (primary) or £88 (secondary) for each pupil with low prior attainment, uplifted by the area cost adjustment.
For example, a 210-pupil primary with 30 low-prior-attainment pupils would get about £8,700, and a 900-pupil secondary with 120 about £26,200, before the area cost adjustment. Your own figure is in your allocation statement.
Activity that aligns with the DfE's seven principles of inclusion (below). It has to be additional: not general running costs, not subsidising something you already do, not capital works. The DfE's best-practice guidance includes "improving or adapting carefully selected technology to support a range of needs" and "evaluation and data collection on the impact of targeted interventions" among its examples. Worked examples below ↓
Publish an inclusion strategy on your school website by 31 December 2026, and update it annually. It's a condition of the grant. It has to set out the barriers to learning you've identified across your cohort, the activities you've invested in to alleviate them with their budgeted costs, the intended outcomes, and (from year two) a review of the previous year. The DfE has published an optional inclusion strategy template (Word).
No. Some or all of it can be carried into future financial years, but it must be used by 31 March 2028 and the carry-forward should be documented in the strategy.
Sources: GOV.UK, conditions of grant 2026 to 2027; methodology; developing an inclusion strategy; best practice for schools. Robyn is an independent supplier. We are not endorsed or approved by the DfE, and there is no approved-supplier list for this fund.
Your spend needs to align with one or more of these principles. There's a worked example for each one below.
The guidance is blunt about priority: "High quality teaching is the most important lever for improving outcomes for all pupils in mainstream schools, particularly those with SEND."
Whatever you spend it on, the strategy must cover these four areas. The DfE's template lays them out as tables; you don't have to use it, but you do have to cover all four.
The barrier to learning or participation you've identified across your cohort.
What you're investing in to alleviate it, whether it's universal or targeted, and its budgeted cost.
What you expect to change (attendance, progress, participation, engagement, wellbeing) and how you'll measure it.
How you'll know. What evidence you'll have in twelve months to say whether it worked.
Each one follows the DfE template: the barrier, the activity and whether it's universal or targeted, the intended outcome and how you'd measure it, and what the budgeted cost would cover. They're our illustrations, not DfE examples, and your own entries should start from the barriers you've found in your cohort. Copy and adapt anything useful.
Robyn watches the board and listens to the live lesson, and answers pupils' questions with scaffolded, Socratic support based on what the teacher has just taught. It can explain the topic in simpler terms to those who are struggling and provide extension tasks to those who need stretching all at the same time.
Adaptive teaching is hard to deliver single-handed. In a live lesson the teacher can only realistically deliver differentiated input to perhaps two groups ("Blue group, off you go to get started. Red group, stay on the carpet."). Everyone else in between might guess, wait, or quietly stop working. Pupils with SEMH or communication needs, and the ones who are anxious about attracting attention, are rarely the ones who put a hand up.
It's a workload barrier too: writing properly differentiated re-explanations and worked examples for every lesson is not sustainable for most teachers.
Because Robyn follows along during the lesson, it can give a differentiated explanation, based on the teacher's own lesson, to anyone who needs it. The best-practice guidance lists "improving or adapting carefully selected technology to support a range of needs" under creating inclusive environments. Robyn makes the lesson easier to access: pupils can ask by voice or by showing a photo of their work instead of writing, and anxious pupils can get help without putting a hand up.
Robyn also keeps a record of the questions pupils ask and where they get stuck. That gives SENCOs an early signal about need, in line with the fund's aim of "providing early support directly to children without the need for diagnosis or statutory process".
The nearest published evidence to what Robyn does in a lesson is the EEF's guidance on deploying teaching assistants. Its second recommendation is to scaffold learning and build pupils' independence, and the scaffolding framework alongside it starts with the least help and adds more only when needed: self-scaffolding first, then prompting, clueing and modelling, with correcting (giving the answer) as a last resort. That is how we have built Robyn to reply. The same guidance warns against spoon-feeding, closed questions, pushing pupils to finish the task rather than understand it, and leaving too little thinking time. It also warns about the "separation effect", where the pupils getting the most adult support end up with the least time with their teacher and their classmates. Robyn is open to everyone in the room, so no pupil is marked out by using it.
You will also have evidence from your own classrooms. Teachers and SENCOs can read every question pupils asked and every answer Robyn gave, showing where pupils get stuck, on what, how often, and whether that shifts over the year. That will inform the review step of your inclusion strategy.
Source: EEF, Deployment of Teaching Assistants guidance report, updated March 2025. The DfE also encourages every school to use the EEF's guide to inclusive teaching when writing its strategy.
Setup is a video call with us. There's nothing to install and no devices to buy. We suggest starting with one or two teachers, running a trial for a few weeks, and deciding from there.
Outcomes you could reasonably write into a strategy: pupils who never ask in class starting to ask, less time spent stuck or waiting, more pupils working on their own, and TA hours freed up for targeted work. You can measure all of those against Robyn's logs alongside the attendance, progress and behaviour data you already keep.
Two exchanges from real lessons: one primary, one secondary.

Both are real exchanges, trimmed for length but not reworded. Robyn answers using the method the teacher taught in that lesson, because it heard it being taught. More sample conversations →
Schools without suitable pupil devices can use our Android version with dedicated teacher and pupil handsets instead. Details on the main site.
Robyn is universal, wave-one support. It sits alongside TAs and specialist provision rather than standing in for either. It takes the routine "I'm stuck" moments, so adult time can go to the pupils who need a person.
Robyn will always direct a child to a trusted adult if they show any sign of distress, and flags concerns for staff. Pupils don't log in, and Robyn doesn't need their names or any other direct identifiers. GDPR compliance · Data Processing Agreement.
Robyn answers using what the teacher actually said and showed, so the help matches your methods and your vocabulary. It is not a general-purpose chatbot.

Robyn was founded by Bruce Greig, an accredited Special Educational Needs mediator who has conducted over 700 SEN mediations, alongside 15 years as a school governor. Every demo is with someone who understands what a SENCO and a head are being asked to deliver, and on what budget.
We'd like you to, obviously. But it's your decision as the accountable body, and we'd rather you made it with the conditions of grant in front of you. The tests are: does the spend align with one of the seven principles, is it additional rather than replacing existing activity, and can you show it in your strategy with a barrier, an activity, an intended outcome and a review? We've set out above why we think Robyn meets those tests under principles 3 and 7, and you're free to disagree with us. We are not a DfE-approved supplier; no such list exists for this fund.
Both. Robyn follows whatever is being taught, so it's used for Year 3 fractions and for GCSE English. The two exchanges above are from a Year 4 maths lesson and a secondary English lesson on Great Expectations.
Pupils can share: one device per table is common. We can also supply dedicated hardware; ask us on the call.
No. Robyn can perform some of the tasks of a teaching assistant, but not all of them. Robyn allows your TAs to spend their time with the pupils who genuinely need a person alongside them.
You decide whether to continue. If you do, let us know how many teachers you will be purchasing for (at £500 per teacher per year). If you don't, nothing is owed.
If a pupil says anything that suggests distress or risk, Robyn tells them to speak to a trusted adult and flags the exchange for staff. Teachers can review every conversation.
Robyn is designed for UK GDPR: pupils don't log in and it doesn't need their names. Robots For Schools is ISO/IEC 27001 certified and holds Cyber Essentials. We will provide you with a formal data processing agreement. More on data and GDPR.
A 30-minute online demo, then a free trial with one of your teachers. No commitment until you've seen it in your own classroom.